Overview
What is GitHub?
GitHub is a platform that hosts public and private code and provides software development and collaboration tools. Features include version control, issue tracking, code review, team management, syntax highlighting, etc. Personal plans ($0-50), Organizational plans ($0-200), and Enterprise plans are…
TrustRadius Insights
GitHub is probably the best - in code - collaboration tool out there.
Using GitHub allows developers to make fast and accurate code …
GitHub best code review software ever
Leveraging GitHub as a foundational building block for your technology teams.
The industry standard software versioning tool. Seriously, if you develop code, you need GitHub.
Manage Everything in One Place with GitHub
GitHub - A must have tool for developers
Thanks to GitHub that lets us manage source code without hassle
Gateway to the open-source community
Developers love it
The best code hosting and collaboration tool
GitHub Review
Great code hosting and collaboration tool
GitHub is good VCS.
GitHub: a product so perfect it's become synonymous with Git
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
Team
$40
Enterprise
$210
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $4 per month per user
Product Demos
How to use the new Jira and GitHub integration - Demo Den December 2021
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is GitHub?
GitHub Video
GitHub Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(1028)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
GitHub is a versatile and widely-used platform that offers a range of use cases for developers, researchers, and organizations. Users collaborate in real time through GitHub's best-in-class tooling and simple interface, which is why it is commonly used for personal projects, university assignments, and managing code in team settings. The platform serves as the main integration point with other software, including continuous integration and continuous deployment services, allowing for seamless workflow automation.
GitHub's key use cases include code versioning and management, enabling developers to efficiently track code changes and revert back to earlier points in time. It also helps manage different versions of products for efficient development and deployment. With GitHub's collaboration features, developers can easily work together on code development, push code for others to pull, and collaborate with external contributors. Additionally, GitHub serves as a code hosting platform, allowing developers to easily share code and launch different application versions. It has become the go-to platform for hosting code repositories and establishing portfolios of work for developers in various industries.
Furthermore, GitHub plays a vital role in software research and development departments by providing a secure cloud-based Git repository system. It addresses concerns about longevity, security, and code management for technical project managers. The platform's integration with other tools like Slack, Jenkins, and custom webhooks enhances its functionality as a central repository for code storage, knowledge sharing, interactions tracking, and auditing. GitHub also offers built-in issue tracking capabilities and wiki pages for effective project management.
Moreover, GitHub's ease of use and graphical interface simplify the utilization of Git across platforms within organizations. Technical recruiters rely on GitHub to identify skilled developers while students leverage it for academic projects and assignments. Additionally, researchers utilize GitHub to store repositories from previous research projects and facilitate efficient team code development.
Overall, GitHub is highly regarded by users for its ability to solve challenges related to version control, collaboration on code development across teams or remote locations, issue tracking, project management, and code review. It serves as a central repository for code and provides features like CI/CD automation, documentation management, and easy integration with third-party tools.
Intuitive User Interface: Many users have found GitHub's user interface intuitive and easy to navigate, making it simple for them to explore repositories without the need to clone them. They appreciate how it simplifies the process of navigating through repositories, providing a user-friendly experience.
Fast Data Processing: Several reviewers have appreciated GitHub's speed in updating, packaging, and compressing data. This fast data processing allows for quick merges and highlights code changes efficiently, enabling developers to work with agility.
Robust Version Control: Users highly value GitHub's version control functionality as it provides a historical timeline of code improvements and the ability to revert back to older versions. This feature has been praised by many for its reliability and usefulness in maintaining code integrity throughout development projects.
Challenging to administer team members: Some users have found it challenging to effectively manage team members and collaborators across multiple repositories on GitHub. This becomes particularly difficult when there are varying access rights and roles, requiring extra effort and attention.
Confusing differentiation between user and organization accounts: Users often encounter confusion when trying to differentiate between user and organization accounts on GitHub. This lack of clarity can result in wasted time as they struggle to locate relevant settings or features within the platform.
Slow loading times: Atom, the text editor used in GitHub, has been criticized by users for its slow loading times. This delay can lead to frustration among users who expect a more seamless experience while navigating through their projects.
Users have made several recommendations about GitHub based on their experiences. Here are the three most common recommendations:
-
Start with official documentation and use Git and GitHub via the command line. Users suggest that newcomers to GitHub should begin by referring to the official documentation. They also recommend utilizing Git and GitHub through the command line interface for a seamless experience.
-
Explore integrations with Visual Studio Code and ClickUp. Many users recommend integrating GitHub with Visual Studio Code and ClickUp, as it enhances their workflows. This integration allows for smoother collaboration and improved project management.
-
Improve user-friendliness and accessibility for new users. Some users believe that GitHub could be more user-friendly, especially for those who are new to the platform. They suggest making it more accessible by simplifying the interface or providing more comprehensive guidelines.
It is important to note that these recommendations reflect the opinions and experiences of users and do not represent a consensus among all users.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-25 of 56)Using GitHub allows developers to make fast and accurate code reviews with Pull Requests.
Another feature we really like on GitHub is the CI/CD automation with GitHub actions. It's so easy to connect your code to any 3rd party tool out there. This saves us so many time...
Finally, we use GitHhub as a documentation tool through Markdown files. The docs stay together with code and this is always an advantage.
- Code reviews
- Collaboration and issues
- Integration with 3rd party services
- Open source contribution
- Pricing model (currenty, it is too strict and not flexible)
- Custom themes (eg a more wide main area)
On the other hand, GitHub may be an overkill if you are a single developer (so there is no need for collaboration) or if you are working with too many binaries.
GitHub best code review software ever
- Version control: GitHub provides a powerful and flexible Git-based version control system that allows teams to track changes to their code over time, collaborate on code with others, and maintain a history of their work.
- Code review: GitHub's pull request system enables teams to review code changes, discuss suggestions and merge changes in a central location. This makes it easier to catch bugs and ensure that code quality remains high.
- Collaboration: GitHub provides a variety of collaboration tools to help teams work together effectively, including issue tracking, project management, and wikis.
- Search functionality, have a better way to search for a sample of code
- Code visualization, have a better way to compare diff versions of code in a file
- Customization, have more customization options, such as the ability to create custom workflows and add custom tools and integrations
GitHub - A must have tool for developers
- Able to switch back to previous code if error occurs while running present code.
- Enables us to work in a team in an effective manner.
- Allows giving roles and access to specific people assigned.
- We can choose between private and public repository that enhances privacy.
- Deleting a folder is pretty hard in GitHub. It should be made as easy as deleting a file.
- It would be better if the code editing environment has more features like other IDEs.
The best code hosting and collaboration tool
- GitHub has a powerful UI for creating pull requests
- It makes it easy to research and find what code changed and when.
- It is reliable and dependable. I've used it for four years without issue.
- I would like to be able to view commits by user.
- Conflict management could be improved.
- Navigating around a GitHub repo can be a little confusing until you're used to it.
Great code hosting and collaboration tool
- GitHub actions easily help manage pipelines of the application and with these, you can do code health checks and deploy to any platform.
- Proper clean and simple project management via issues and boards.
- Analytics of one's contribution over a period of time.
- It has lots of widely popular open source projects.
- The project management could be a bit more robust by proving epics.
- Would be better to be able to merge organization and personal account contribution over the year.
- Actions marketplace could be better by automatically installing them in the specified repo.
GitHub is good VCS.
- Easy to use
- Distributed development
- Large community
- Open Source
- Continuous integration leads to problems
- Worst team experience at same project
- Nested commands
- Seamless integration with Git. Although you can use Git without using GitHub, the two have become almost synonymous.
- It provides a nice web-based UI for interacting with your central Git repository.
- Facilitates working with multiple branches, forks, and pull requests—all different aspects of having multiple people working on the same code simultaneously.
- Honestly, I'm having a hard time coming up with any cons or things I would change.
Great service to manage your version control system
- Version control system GUI is great
- Open-source support
- Pull request reviews are easy
- Conflict resolution interface is helpful
- UI could be a bit easier to use, especially the tabs on the pull request page
- Version Control: GitHub, being built over Git, makes it fast and easy to develop projects in versions/branches and easily rollback to previous versions when necessary.
- Pull Requests/Review: GitHub has a powerful UI for creating pull requests, with useful tools like inline commenting and more recently "suggested changes". Pull request history is always maintained and easy to search.
- Collaboration/Auditing: It's easy for multiple team members to work on the same project and merge changes (often) seamlessly. All contributions are tracked so it's easy to identify contributors.
- Industry Standard: GitHub is used by virtually all major open source projects so it's very easy to find and contribute to projects of interest if you're well versed with GitHub.
- Reviewing large pull requests can be tedious and it can be tough to identify recent changes (e.g. a one line change) in new files or files with lots of changes.
- It should be a bit harder to push unresolved merge conflicts, we've had these slip through once in awhile.
- You have to be careful with merge operations; a bad merge can be painful to reverse.
- Pretty much any development project (solo or as a team, it's always useful to have backups/project history; you never need to worry about losing your work if you commit/push regularly)
- Projects involving multiple collaborators with and a structured text-based syntax
Situation where Github is less appropriate:
- It's less useful for situations where you have multiple collaborators working on written/formatted reports; I've found Git can produce some nasty merge conflicts in these situations
There is no other Hub like this one!
- Version Control - You can see the progression of where you started to where you are today, and if need be, rewind to a certain time in the past and use that version if need be.
- Storage Space - There are really no limits to the amount of information you can keep in one place.
- Collaboration - Contributors can be one or can be many, and GitHub keeps track of each instance by the author.
- UI - Although there is a readme file that can be made to look pretty, over the UI is very dry.
- App or web app - If there we an easier way to integrate with GitHub versus the command line, I am sure the number of users would increase dramatically.
- Glossary of Actions - There is not one place to which one author could go to find an absolute glossary of what actions do and what those actions are. Very hard to decipher the amount of information available on the web.
The best hosted version control and software collaboration tool
- Integrations with services like Heroku that allow us to deploy staging environments from a pull request.
- Familiarity with other developers making it easy to add a collaborator to a project and have them make a productive impact on the project right away without learning new tools.
- It makes it easy to review and collaborate on open source projects and private ones.
- It has many GUI client options for those who are not as comfortable with the command line.
- Helpful reporting of contributor activity and built-in project management features like docs and comments.
- In some ways, the design of GitHub incentivizes the use of certain practices like using pull requests, which may not fit your organization's workflow (though I don't really see this to be an issue personally, and if your organization isn't using something like pull requests, then I would question why).
GitHub Review
- I prefer the way GitHub presents/manages code reviews.
- Making changes and opening pull requests are incredibly easy in GitHub. When you have a small change you need to make it's incredibly annoying to have to pull then branch then commit then push then go back to the browser to open a PR.
- Built-in wiki, issue tracking and reporting, and other tools can be incredibly useful.
- Browsing through a repo is pretty primitive. Digging into a folder is a link to a new page. For medium to large repositories, it's extremely cumbersome. The way Azure DevOps manages this is incredible. It gives you a folder explorer as you'd find in VS Code. You can quickly browse through a complex repo and make in line changes and submit a pull request all from inside the browser.
- Navigating around a GitHub repo can be a little confusing until you're used to it.
GitHub is Everything You Need for Version Control
- Code difference comparison
- Private repositories that are stored outside the organization
- Code highlighting for ObjectScript
- Issues tracking is easy to attach to commit history
- Syntax highlighting for more obscure file types, like csp (Cache Server Page)
- Better handling or notification of deleted forked repos. If you delete the repo, the pull request will show up as "unknown repository" which creates odd dead ends
GitHub: The ubiquitous code repo solution that just works
- It's very easy to use. It walks you through much of anything that you may have questions with. Like how to link a local repo to your online one.
- It's ubiquitous. So many open-source projects are hosted on GitHub.
- Integrations abound: With that ubiquity, you get some great benefits of tie-ins existing and new tooling. For example, there are continuous integrations for deployment and cutting-edge integrations with tools like Zeit Now and Netlify.
- They have some nice-to-have features like security bots that will auto bump versions of dependencies for your project (if you desire.)
- The social aspect of it is pretty nice and works well.
- It's a good thing to have for a developer resume.
- Git can be cumbersome and confusing as a whole, so sometimes the UI is a little too basic.
- It got bought by Microsoft.
But then again, having a "GitHub profile" is a worthwhile endeavor for any developer looking to get a job.
The best choice for hosting code online
- Excellent integration with CI/CD tools: testing and deployment are easy via GitHub's ecosystem.
- Great code review tools.
- Easy to link to and share specific lines of code to communicate with engineers.
- Notifications are noisy by default and hard to configure to do what you want.
- No cross-repo issue tracking, hard to see all open pull requests at once.
- We pay per seat, which means sometimes we introduce extra friction because we can't give everyone access to our GitHub.
Solid and reliable code version control system that makes distributed collaboration easy.
- GitHub's ease of use is one of its biggest strengths. The site is structured around Git, a code version control system, which is used by developers around the world. GitHub's UI is minimal and allows you to focus on what's important, whether it be your branches, pull requests, or issues.
- GitHub's integrations and tools are fairly ubiquitous. You'll likely find an integration with GitHub on every development tool with integrations. This makes it easy to incorporate in whatever workflow you may have.
- GitHub is incredibly reliable. I don't remember the last time it was down for any significant period of time. This is essential for companies that rely on it for their daily operations.
- While GitHub's spartan UI gets the job done and doesn't distract, it has some room for improvement to make things even more intuitive, especially for newer users. There's a certain amount of learning curve that could be made less steep.
- There's so much you can do with Github that it's fairly common for a user to possibly only use a small fraction of what GitHub can do. Improving Github's discovery features would help surface some of the non-essential features that are quite useful.
There aren't many situations where you should use GitHub. Even a single programmer would benefit from using it. Furthermore, it has other uses related to issue tracking and documentation that increase its value.
Keep Your Code in the Cloud Without Sky-High Pricing
- GitHub is a great, free or low-cost cloud-based Git repository system for smaller teams; it's easy to add members and collaborators to one or more repositories, as well as to modify user roles and rights.
- GitHub provides a handy and highly transparent front end on top of the renowned Git system. Visibility into developer productivity, including code commits, is well-represented in GitHub's dashboards.
- GitHub provides extremely detailed and focused user support documentation online, allowing every team member to build their Git skills incrementally while ensuring that most basic issues are handled quickly via end-user self-service.
- GitHub packs a lot of functionality into its website; sometimes it can be difficult to navigate to the correct sub-page; the various drop-down selection boxes and sidebar menus can be confusing to users, especially ones with lightweight experience with the interface.
- GitHub allows for substantial flexibility in user account management - Administering dedicated team members and collaborators across a large number of repositories can get tricky, especially if users have varying access rights or roles across various repositories.
- Knowing the difference between user and organization accounts is key, there have been many times where I've wasted minutes looking at the wrong account trying to find a relevant setting or feature. For example, to view correct account billing information, one must be on the organization account, not the user account that has administrator rights for the organization.
Friendly UI with lots of features
- Free hosting of open source projects and a limited number of private repositories as well for individuals.
- Free website hosting of statically generated websites or Jekyll Ruby on Rails-based projects.
- Issue tracking, pull request system.
- CI/CD capabilities.
- Enforcing rules like PR needs to be accepted for a merge and other team management and policy features.
- Widely adopted, large user base.
- Very friendly and easy to use UI, many tasks can be done through the web.
- Organizations without a paid plan cannot have private repositories.
- Free repositories have a size limit of 1GB.
- Support could be slow to respond.
- Migrating repositories to other services can be hard.
- Branches are links and trees instead of a replica.
- GitHub gists are very good and helpful for storing and referring commands and scripts.
- Github pages lets user/organizations have static websites without a need for hosting services.
- The transparency and fine grain access control for Pull Requests, including constraints on reviews and mergers are too very good.
- The wide range of GitHub APIs help Automation engineers to automate lot of work flows, especially WebHooks.
- Pricing. There are other tools like GitLab which have similar features and are free.
- File size restrictions. File size cannot be greater than 100 MB.
- The Project Management section of github is not very great.
From the Automation team perspective, Github has many APIs and third party integrations which help in automating the workflows like CICD. Teams can write apps on top of GitHub APIs to do more analytics on the developer productivity and much more.
Popular implementation of Git that gets the job done
- Easy and intuitive UI. This is a big plus for anyone wanting to just explore the repository without cloning it.
- Solid security model for repositories. You can provide Dev access or limited access to the repositories that enable collaboration across the org.
- Robust Pull Requests (PR) model. We use PR to do code reviews and the PR feature set is easy and intuitive. You can request PR's for other dev's, they can write comments at a specific line of code and you can reply back to that comment using their UI. All of this enables healthy communication on code.
- Endless customizations. Github is wildly popular, so it has solid integrations with other developer tools. You can also add webhooks to trigger deployments when a new branch has been merged into Master. This allows for a seamless continuous integration pipeline.
- Robust API documentation. The older version of Github offers easy REST interface and their newer API implementation uses GraphQL, which is robust and allows Dev's to build their own tools on top of Github
- Branch Protections. You can protect a specific branch on your repo and restrict who can directly commit/delete that branch. This prevents unintended code base deletions .
- Project tracking using Github. Github also provides tracking using its interface. You can create development tasks, assign them and track the left over work using the Github interface. Which makes it a one stop shop for everything.
- The Pull Request screen would hide the previous comments when a new commit has been made. This could be a bit confusing tracking all the comments on a PR.
- The network tracking branch could also use some improvement. It's hard to track all the open branches and where they all merge on the repo. The screen could use some improvement.
- It does not provide integrated CI tool. There are competitors of Github that provide integrated deployment tool and Github could use that improvement.
GitHub is the defacto standard and it deserves to be.
- Pull Requests
- Versioning
- Issue Tracking
- Planning
- Collaboration
- Code Navigation
- Mobile
- Notification Controls
GitHub - Versioning Control
- GitHub is a place where we can keep the artifacts such as source code, lookup data, and other callable information. GitHub can be integrated with deployment tools such as Jenkins, TeamCity and any cloud DevOps tools. These tools can call/read the code or data from GitHub which works as a hub or repository.
- GitHub works as version control. Meaning, when you upload the code script with multiple changes, the GitHub stores old copies as versions. If you want to restore back to the point-in-time code script, GitHub provides you to restore it. So GitHub gives security over your code.
- GitHub provides public and private access. Public is free. Private charges. For proof of concept projects, development or testing, we can use PUBLIC access which is cheap or free.
- GitHub is great tool. when you want to push a code change or small update, you would need to required to pull the entire GitHub repository unto your PC. This need to mitigate.
Amazing Tool for not just developers but for PMO too
As per its flagship functionality of forking which is duplicating a vault starting with one client's record then onto the next - this empowers us to take an undertaking where we don't have compose access and change it under our own record. In the event that we make changes we'd like to share, we can send a warning called a "pull demand" to the first proprietor.
- Fork
- Pull Request
- Merge
- Only for premium users to use
- File size limitations
- Private repositories for free accounts
Great software!
- Source control
- Reviewing code
- General ease of use
- Searching through code
- Outside collaborator functionality makes it hard to assign permissions correctly.
GitHub's social code sharing is the killer feature.
- Community building. We use it as a social network for talent.
- Tight integration with our other tools and cross-platform support. The recent purchase by Microsoft makes this our top choice.
- Issue tracking in public projects is excellent. It's a great training tool for our junior programmers.
- It's hard to pull a single sub-folder from the repository. Some repositories are very large and we only need to track one section locally.
- It's complex compared to Subversion or Mercurial.
- Better graphical UI tools for visualizing repositories would be helpful.